Can we keep our solar promise to improve the lives of people like
these two children living in developing countries?
Photo: SELCO
Bangalore, India [RenewableEnergyAccess.com]
It has always been a foregone conclusion that solar photovoltaics (PV)
makes sense in the rural parts of the developing world. We have seen reams
of paper convincing policy makers, manufacturers, donors, multilaterals,
bilaterals, etc., just how solar solves energy challenges for basic human
amenities.
Over the years we have seen the costs of solar panels steadily come down, though not to the levels that many experts had predicted. The critical question always has been, at what point ($/watt) would solar PV make commercial sense for the rural areas of the developing world? I personally have never been clear what baselines people were using to compare against to reach their conclusions. I am not sure how convenience, reliability, better educational facilities, etc., have been transformed into financial figures on a spreadsheet. However, I sincerely believe from experience that solar PV is already very viable -- provided accessible and affordable financing is created at the doorsteps of the rural people -- thus I hardly paid attention to the future predictions of $/watt. Peak in Demand
|
Rise in Disparity
Documentation for the actual rise in the prices of smaller modules over the last five years, both in 37 watt and in 75 watt supplies, is shown below. As seen in the diagram above, prices for 37 watts and 75 watts remained steady till 2004 and then started to rise. There has been an increase of 20% and 25% for 37 watt and 75 watt, respectively, as compared to 2003 prices. And a 25% increase in price really hurts the pockets of a rural household in the developing world. We can keep debating, who needs electricity more -- a German household (who has a choice between grid and solar) or a rural household in Uganda (who has a choice between kerosene and solar), but the bottom line is that the solar industry does not have an immediate solution. There is also another problem: squeeze in the supply of smaller modules has increased the working capital requirements of smaller integrators in the developing world. While in 2004, smaller integrators were getting a credit period of 90 days, now they have to be satisfied with 30-day periods. This means that the working capital requirements have tripled. Unlike Germany, where payment terms from end-users are pretty well defined, here in the underdeveloped world that is not the case -- leading to further uncertainty for the system integrators. Call for Balance
|