07 January 2009 by Debora Mackenzie
HOW do you manage a global boom in nuclear
power while discouraging weapons proliferation? Uranium and plutonium are
most likely to find their way into weapons via the enrichment and reprocessing
of fuel for nuclear power plants. If all of the countries now planning
to go nuclear also handle their own fuel cycles, the proliferation risk
could skyrocket.
The answer may be to put the fuel cycle entirely
under international control. Many governments, international agencies and
arms control experts are calling for the establishment of international
fuel banks, and eventually fuel production plants, that would pledge to
supply nuclear materials to any country so long as it meets non-proliferation
rules. The US already supports the idea, at least for new nuclear powers,
and last month the European Union (EU) pledged €25 million towards
the first fuel bank. Yet this means countries with new nuclear programmes
would have to place control of their fuel supply at least partly in foreign
hands. Could it actually work?
Last year saw fresh predictions of the proliferation
of nuclear weapons, especially in the politically explosive Middle East.
The most critical situation is Iran, which has rejected international demands
to stop enriching uranium. In a report released last month, the International
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) warned that Iran's uranium enrichment is
expanding, and the agency could not exclude military use. Analysts at the
Institute for Science and International Security in Washington DC, an anti-proliferation
think tank, say the country could have enough for a nuclear weapon this
year. With some nations in the region already nuclear, neighbouring countries
could feel pressure to follow suit (see "Nuclear Middle East" =>). At the
same time, many are looking to acquire their own nuclear industries, meaning
there will soon be far more weapons-grade material around (see graph =>).
For most nuclear newcomers in the region and
elsewhere, the move to nuclear power is largely independent of military
concerns. Nuclear power capacity worldwide could almost double by 2030,
says Vilmos Cserveny, head of external relations at the IAEA, mainly because
poor countries face climbing oil prices and crippling electricity shortages.
The problem is that countries that may not have the infrastructure needed
to enforce stringent controls will be managing nuclear materials for the
first time. Of the nuclear power plants now under construction, says Cserveny,
around half are in developing countries, especially in Asia (see chart
=>). |
The world does not need more enrichment plants
to fuel this expansion; there are plenty, especially in Russia. Of the
30 countries already with nuclear power, only 14 enrich their own fuel
- the rest buy it in. However, some countries may be wary of depending
on foreign powers for their energy and might want to make and reprocess
their own fuel. Every new fuel plant increases the risk that fissile material
will find its way into weapons, so the challenge is to find ways to guarantee
fuel supplies without countries building their own facilities, says Cserveny.
Nuclear middle east
Iran isn't the only Middle Eastern nation that
has observers worried about nuclear proliferation. Nine other countries
in the region plan to build around 12 nuclear power plants over the next
decade. This will produce enough plutonium in spent fuel for 1700 nuclear
weapons, says David Albright of the Institute for Science and International
Security in Washington DC, an anti-proliferation think tank. With nuclear
weapons already in Israel, Pakistan, India and potentially Iran, there
is motivation to acquire them.
If the newcomers acquire fuel production and
reprocessing facilities then the risk of material finding its way into
weapons will rise sharply. Inspections might prevent this, but only eight
countries in the region - including Iran - have signed the International
Atomic Energy Agency's most stringent inspections agreement, known as the
Additional Protocol. Only four countries enforce it. Egypt says it will
never sign. Both it and Turkey reject a proposed moratoriumMovie Camera
on enrichment and reprocessing in the region put forward by, among others,
Sweden's Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission.
Meanwhile, Gulf states have decided it makes
business sense to sell their ever-scarcer oil and buy nuclear power for
themselves. In December, the US agreed to sell a nuclear reactor to the
United Arab Emirates. Both sides say the UAE will forego enrichment and
sign the protocol. Yet it's unclear whether the signed deal stipulates
this, says Henry Sokolski, who serves on the US Congress's anti-proliferation
commission.
tableaux
|